Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Britton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Super Bikes!. --MelanieN (talk) 23:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Britton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source for this article is the subjects website. This has been the case for over 4 years. He thus falls far short of the GNG. John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:45, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete subject's own website alone is not enough to demonstrate notability Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Super Bikes!. We already have an article on Britton's TV show, so if his notablity is in question obviously Jason Britton should redirect to the show. It's rather lazy to claim there is no coverage of Britton besides his own website. Did nobody go to Google News? [1][2][3] or Books? I don't think there's enough to justify an article on both Super Bikes! and Britton himself so merging the two solves that. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 20:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.